Sunday, January 24, 2010
Final blogs
Alright guys...we're done! I've really enjoyed your posts and feedback here all semester long!
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Podcast- Kris
hey, this will probable be my last post of this class, and im very sad about it. So i choose to review a fun podcast, that i laughed all the way htrought. Kris Webers. now im probable the 5 person on this blog to post on his podcast, but it was so funny and amusing that i couldn't help myself.
J. K Rowling
I laughed so hard at the beginning of this podcast. The HaveADay productions beginning.
I liked your use of visuals when he is talking about JK’s history. The writers she looked up to as a child and her writing’s in their styles.
The legend of how JK Rowling came up with the idea for harry potter is famous.
One of my favourite parts of this podcast is how he was able to merge the videos of previous interviews with JK Rowling with the questions he wanted to ask himself. I thought this was creative and interesting because it made this podcast so interesting because the listeners were able to hear the author’s actual response to questions. I thought this was a very effective method of attraction the reader’s interest.
I thought you did a good job at identifying what her style of writing is and how she used it to so much success in her series.
In conclusion, i thought this was a great podcast, it was interesting, mesmerizing, the video clips keep the listeners attention and able to maintain it thought out the entire piece.
J. K Rowling
I laughed so hard at the beginning of this podcast. The HaveADay productions beginning.
I liked your use of visuals when he is talking about JK’s history. The writers she looked up to as a child and her writing’s in their styles.
The legend of how JK Rowling came up with the idea for harry potter is famous.
One of my favourite parts of this podcast is how he was able to merge the videos of previous interviews with JK Rowling with the questions he wanted to ask himself. I thought this was creative and interesting because it made this podcast so interesting because the listeners were able to hear the author’s actual response to questions. I thought this was a very effective method of attraction the reader’s interest.
I thought you did a good job at identifying what her style of writing is and how she used it to so much success in her series.
In conclusion, i thought this was a great podcast, it was interesting, mesmerizing, the video clips keep the listeners attention and able to maintain it thought out the entire piece.
Podcast- Shak
This was an interesting podcast. With a mixture of interesting audio and neat tech tricks, Shak was able to create a truly unique experience for his listeners.
The influence you mentioned were very interesting, how you talked about the effect of not having a mother figure in his life, and the effect of the "evil" stepmother.
I liked how you mentioned how he would to take aspect from real life and turn them into something creative. I thought this was an important aspect that continues throughout his life.
I liked your analysis of his style of writing. His mechanics of only using a single quotation marks and the constant use of comma reminded me of ee cummings, and the way he uses mechanics in interesting ways to make a point.
Talking about the use of a first person narrative, and how he does it for the purpose of his audience being able to see the world he has created from the protagonist’s perspective.
Good use of visuals in this piece, as well it was kind of creepy how you were able to make the lips of the pictures move, this was interesting yet distracting to the listeners because we were so creped out.
Overall I enjoyed listening to our podcast, i thought you touched on some very interesting piece of his writing style, and how his past affected his style of writing.
Good job, it was quite interesting.
The influence you mentioned were very interesting, how you talked about the effect of not having a mother figure in his life, and the effect of the "evil" stepmother.
I liked how you mentioned how he would to take aspect from real life and turn them into something creative. I thought this was an important aspect that continues throughout his life.
I liked your analysis of his style of writing. His mechanics of only using a single quotation marks and the constant use of comma reminded me of ee cummings, and the way he uses mechanics in interesting ways to make a point.
Talking about the use of a first person narrative, and how he does it for the purpose of his audience being able to see the world he has created from the protagonist’s perspective.
Good use of visuals in this piece, as well it was kind of creepy how you were able to make the lips of the pictures move, this was interesting yet distracting to the listeners because we were so creped out.
Overall I enjoyed listening to our podcast, i thought you touched on some very interesting piece of his writing style, and how his past affected his style of writing.
Good job, it was quite interesting.
Tamara | Dr. Seuss
I POSTED THIS I CLASS BUT FOR SOME REASON IT DID NOT DISPLAY SO I AM POSTING AGAIN NOW :O
Well this pod cast could be summarized by one simple word: Cute. Tamara did a great job at capturing the light playfulness of Dr.Seuss while giving some awesome insight on the author as a individual and his influences, everything we wanted to see in these pod casts! Her original piece was creativity, and her drawings really brought it to life, and seemed very ‘Seuss-like’. Her tone was soft and consistent throughout. I found her pod cast to be very informative, and found myself intrigued throughout. I enjoyed Dr.Seuss’ biography and I think it did his history justice. I also really liked the length of this pod cast, it didn’t drag on but was rather to the point and that let what she was telling us sink in better. The only thing I didn’t like was the random change in quality of sound quality when her original piece started. Other than that, I was very pleased with this pod cast, and overall have been with each one I watched. Great job Tamara, loved it!
Well this pod cast could be summarized by one simple word: Cute. Tamara did a great job at capturing the light playfulness of Dr.Seuss while giving some awesome insight on the author as a individual and his influences, everything we wanted to see in these pod casts! Her original piece was creativity, and her drawings really brought it to life, and seemed very ‘Seuss-like’. Her tone was soft and consistent throughout. I found her pod cast to be very informative, and found myself intrigued throughout. I enjoyed Dr.Seuss’ biography and I think it did his history justice. I also really liked the length of this pod cast, it didn’t drag on but was rather to the point and that let what she was telling us sink in better. The only thing I didn’t like was the random change in quality of sound quality when her original piece started. Other than that, I was very pleased with this pod cast, and overall have been with each one I watched. Great job Tamara, loved it!
Dylan | Steven King
POSTED IN CLASS BUT FOR SOME REASON DID NOT DISPLAY
I'm going to start off by saying I've seen this podcast several times as Dylan kept pestering me to watch it, so I sort of feel obligated to review his podcast now. I think Dylan did a great job by using that eerie voice. As soon as he mentioned Steven King's name, the tone was set wonderfully, and he did a great job at keeping it up throughout his video. The video had good pacing and wasn’t too long. I think what really brought out his video was his use of music, his soundtrack selection helped the pacing wonderfully, I found it to do wonders to his pod cast. I really enjoyed his use of pictures of Steven King himself as opposed to random photos of his life, it may seem odd, but I enjoyed looking at Steven King hehe…
Dylan’s biography of King was good, it covered what needed to be covered and his influences did a good job at uncovering his past some more as well. Content wise, it seemed great. I really enjoyed his original piece, I’d love to read it as whole novel, although that won’t happen any time soon. The presentation was great, very creativity, and I could tell he put a considerable amount of effort into it.
Overall I felt it was great, and I enjoyed it….even if I did watch 13 times….or some ish like that.
I'm going to start off by saying I've seen this podcast several times as Dylan kept pestering me to watch it, so I sort of feel obligated to review his podcast now. I think Dylan did a great job by using that eerie voice. As soon as he mentioned Steven King's name, the tone was set wonderfully, and he did a great job at keeping it up throughout his video. The video had good pacing and wasn’t too long. I think what really brought out his video was his use of music, his soundtrack selection helped the pacing wonderfully, I found it to do wonders to his pod cast. I really enjoyed his use of pictures of Steven King himself as opposed to random photos of his life, it may seem odd, but I enjoyed looking at Steven King hehe…
Dylan’s biography of King was good, it covered what needed to be covered and his influences did a good job at uncovering his past some more as well. Content wise, it seemed great. I really enjoyed his original piece, I’d love to read it as whole novel, although that won’t happen any time soon. The presentation was great, very creativity, and I could tell he put a considerable amount of effort into it.
Overall I felt it was great, and I enjoyed it….even if I did watch 13 times….or some ish like that.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Patti's Podcast!
The first thing I want to give huge credit to Patti on, is her clear and extensive knowledge of her author. As I watched Patti's podcast, I did not feel like it was a research project of any sort, as some may have seemed. Instead, it came off as something similar to a blog because it seemed more like her expressing her interest in the author and why they should be appreciated and recognized as a great author.
As soon as I began watching the podcast, the animated voice stuck out to me because it was something I had not seen in the other podcasts I had watched. It was an interesting element, that I found to be a nice change from expecting the voice of one of our classmates. The animation of this voice was very fitting to the theme of your podcast.
The balance between audio and music was used very effectively which made for a smooth transition between topics and gave the podcast a nice flow to it. The only thing that I found could have been slightly altered was the timing of your clips with text on them. Sometimes the text was long, but not enough time was given to read them. That is my only criticism! Great variety and balance as well as creativity. Well done Patti!
As soon as I began watching the podcast, the animated voice stuck out to me because it was something I had not seen in the other podcasts I had watched. It was an interesting element, that I found to be a nice change from expecting the voice of one of our classmates. The animation of this voice was very fitting to the theme of your podcast.
The balance between audio and music was used very effectively which made for a smooth transition between topics and gave the podcast a nice flow to it. The only thing that I found could have been slightly altered was the timing of your clips with text on them. Sometimes the text was long, but not enough time was given to read them. That is my only criticism! Great variety and balance as well as creativity. Well done Patti!
Richard!
Richard's podcast on Lewis Carroll included the element of different perspectives, which added a lot of realistic, but humorous effectiveness to his podcast. Richard's choice to narrate and demonstrate his author's style or writing was unique and very authentic. It is difficult to make your podcast interesting with the same voice over for 15 minutes, but because Richard used multiple characters for the different segments within his podcast, it was alwasy interesting and never felt like it was dull or being dragged on.
Richard's variety of music and dialogue was very well balanced and all together worked to make his podcast complex, but not chaotic or confusing. He found a great median between having enough different elements, but careful not to overload and become distracting.
I did not know very much about Lewis Carrol, infact simply hearing the name, I would not have even been able to tell you he was the author of Alice in Wonderland. Richard's podcast amde it very clear of his interest in Lewis Carroll's writing style, and I found myself learning many new things for exmaple, that there were multiple books based on the theme of Alice in Wonderland.
The ending was a great, fun way to conclude your author and the video was a nice change from the narration and pictures. Really well done Richard!
Richard's variety of music and dialogue was very well balanced and all together worked to make his podcast complex, but not chaotic or confusing. He found a great median between having enough different elements, but careful not to overload and become distracting.
I did not know very much about Lewis Carrol, infact simply hearing the name, I would not have even been able to tell you he was the author of Alice in Wonderland. Richard's podcast amde it very clear of his interest in Lewis Carroll's writing style, and I found myself learning many new things for exmaple, that there were multiple books based on the theme of Alice in Wonderland.
The ending was a great, fun way to conclude your author and the video was a nice change from the narration and pictures. Really well done Richard!
Kris Weber
Kris, this is definitely the most creative and unique podcast I got to see. Although I did not see all of the classes podcastsm I can't imagine any of the others being quite like yours! You variety of clips,videos, pictures and narration were very effective. When I first opened your podcast and was suprised by a collection of crazy, spontaneous music&dancing, I was instantly intrigued and curious as to where the chaos and fun was leading to. Of course, I also thought to myself, what the heck does this have to do with JK Rowling`s writing techniques! I really enjoyed the change in the style of your podcast in comparison to the others. Many other people had great narration, interesting voice effects and bacnground music, however, instead of only watching pictures change and rotate out of context, it was interesting to watch and listen to the person instead of only listen. This made the narration much more animated because it was not a lifeless sounding voice. It is difficult, as many people have probably experienced, to sound enthusiastic and lively throughout the entire podcast while recording voice clips. With the videos of yourself and Dylan, the podcast had a completely different liveliness to it and made for an interesting 15 minutes. Your musical elements with Dylan playing guitar added a lot of character to this podcast, and your spin on JK Rowling was unexpected and original. Although the podcast to most was based on straight facts about the author you chose, you decided to include a subtle, nonetheless very clear opinion on the author you chose. Adding your own opinion was an effectiveb addition. I thoroughly enjoyed your podcast, you did a great job!
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Kris' Podcast - J.K. Rowling
While I have to say that some of the production value was more questionable, the creativity and humour used were great!
From the very beginning he lured us in with a little bit of fun, him and dylan dancing and wearing funny costumes to entertain us. From that point on Kris creatively used video clips of himself and of J.K. Rowling to comedic effect. (There's nothing wrong with adults writing kids books though! Who else is going to write them? :P) Through also using music in effective ways in the background and during his original piece he really made an interesting media college to represent J.K. Rowling and her work. The sheer uniqueness of this podcast is what really set it apart from the rest of the podcast in terms of enjoyability.
He also used honesty in that he wasn't sure how effective certain parts of his podcast were, however I felt most of his techniques were effective despite his uncertainty.
I also enjoyed the ending as it was a cute way to finish things off with a well known video of the 'Potter Puppet Pals'. Very cute!!
Overall this video was just a lot of fun to watch, and seemed like it must've been just as enjoyable to tape with a friend. Good job Kris!
From the very beginning he lured us in with a little bit of fun, him and dylan dancing and wearing funny costumes to entertain us. From that point on Kris creatively used video clips of himself and of J.K. Rowling to comedic effect. (There's nothing wrong with adults writing kids books though! Who else is going to write them? :P) Through also using music in effective ways in the background and during his original piece he really made an interesting media college to represent J.K. Rowling and her work. The sheer uniqueness of this podcast is what really set it apart from the rest of the podcast in terms of enjoyability.
He also used honesty in that he wasn't sure how effective certain parts of his podcast were, however I felt most of his techniques were effective despite his uncertainty.
I also enjoyed the ending as it was a cute way to finish things off with a well known video of the 'Potter Puppet Pals'. Very cute!!
Overall this video was just a lot of fun to watch, and seemed like it must've been just as enjoyable to tape with a friend. Good job Kris!
random. :)
i dont think i've ever appreciated the art of photojournalism (courtesy of the new york times) as much as i do now in the aftermath of the earthquake that devastated Haiti.
check out the photo gallery at www.nytimes.com
these pictures, while horrifying, are of such better quality than it seems we see in our own local paper. just an observation.
check out the photo gallery at www.nytimes.com
these pictures, while horrifying, are of such better quality than it seems we see in our own local paper. just an observation.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Dylan's Podcast - Stephen King
Dylan's Podcast was very effective. The eerie tone of Stephen King was established immediately. As a project that is heavily reliant on voice, Dylan definitely used his voice to capture the interest of the viewer. It was clear and concise, which allowed the listener to easily follow what was being said. The influences and stylistic elements were clearly addressed. Dylan also had a good flow to his speaking - which, mixed with humor and a dramatic tone - contributed to a very entertaining Podcast. This tone was also enforced with the use of music, quietly playing in the background.
This contrast between Dylan's humour and Stephen's dark and eeriness worked surprisingly well together. The interest of the viewer was easily maintained. Accompanying the audio was the effective use of visuals. These images enforced what was being said. (And as a side note, Stephen King is kind of a creeper).
The only thing I can think of to criticise is the fact that 'Stephen kept his rejection slips,' was repeated multiple times throughout the Podcast. However, this repetition also enforces the idea, and its importance to King's writing.
Lastly, I have to address the original piece. It was presented very creatively. It was also clearly introduced, so that the reader could easily follow what was going on. Dylan clearly stated just how his original piece was an effective imitation of King's writing. He also incorporated images, sound effects and music that enforced the creepy tone. The use of voice was again put into play, as each character was given a different voice.
And to those who have seen the Podcast understand how I will now never look at Kermit the Frog the same way again.
All in all, the Podcast was very effective at conveying the appropriate information and maintaining the viewer's interest.
Tori's Podcast - C.S. Lewis
Tori tackled a very well known author in a different, quirky sort of way. The name ‘Lit Ninja’ and the flash animations were fun and kept my attention. Although as a real podcast those kind of effects would not be possible, as a videocast it was adorable and entertaining. The animated creations accompanied the text perfectly and didn’t take away from the text, never overpowering it. However, while she was reading her story the characters moved very little and seemed frozen in time. Something else should have been put in there as it seemed like Tori ran out of time.
Another unique concept was that she offered information not only through the words she was speaking, but through the animation and text on the screen. She told us through her voice that C.S. Lewis was sent to a catholic boarding school, and used the text / character on screen to provide us with the little tidbit of information ‘We weren’t even catholic!’
By having a little ninja represent the characters and C.S. Lewis himself Tori managed to keep our attention and visually represent Lewis’ life.
The use of humour throughout Tori’s piece was also very effective as it made things funny and light, keeping the tone enjoyable and not overpowering.
I was a little unsure about Tori’s original piece at first, as I knew I had seen her write better, more engaging works. However, when she went through and explained the techniques in C.S. Lewis’ work, and how she mirrored them, it made sense why she did things the way she did. This made me enjoy her original piece more.
It was cute and fun, and for those reasons I enjoyed Tori’s podcast. Woo!
Another unique concept was that she offered information not only through the words she was speaking, but through the animation and text on the screen. She told us through her voice that C.S. Lewis was sent to a catholic boarding school, and used the text / character on screen to provide us with the little tidbit of information ‘We weren’t even catholic!’
By having a little ninja represent the characters and C.S. Lewis himself Tori managed to keep our attention and visually represent Lewis’ life.
The use of humour throughout Tori’s piece was also very effective as it made things funny and light, keeping the tone enjoyable and not overpowering.
I was a little unsure about Tori’s original piece at first, as I knew I had seen her write better, more engaging works. However, when she went through and explained the techniques in C.S. Lewis’ work, and how she mirrored them, it made sense why she did things the way she did. This made me enjoy her original piece more.
It was cute and fun, and for those reasons I enjoyed Tori’s podcast. Woo!
Cassie's Podcast - Dorothy Allison
Cassie's Podcast was very effective. She used her voice very effectively. It was clear and concise, which allowed the viewer to easily follow what was being said. Cassie spoke slowly and clearly, allowing the viewer to absorb each of the influences and stylistic elements.
Contributing to this good flow was also the use of visuals. Cassie incorporated quotes, which allowed the viewer to see exactly what she was trying to convey. She also used visuals that supported what was being said. No image was left on the screen too long - which also kept the interest of the viewer. Another thing Cassie did effectively was incorporating a video clip that was based off of Dorothy Allison's novel "Bastard out of Carolina." This video was very powerful and certainly grabbed the viewer's attention. It was both disturbing and eye-opening, and established a strong tone that really emphasized Dorothy's life experiences and how they come through in her writing.
The original piece was also presented very effectively. I like how Cassie gave each character their own voice - this really brought the characters to life for the viewer. I also liked the analysis of the original piece. Instead of just reading through her original piece, Cassie broke it up and read sections that applied to each individual stylistic element she was addressing. This allowed the viewer to see precisely how Dorothy uses stylistic elements and how Cassie incorporated these elements, side by side.
I don't know what else I can say about Cassie's Podcast. It was done very well. All information was relevant and presented in an interesting and easy to follow manner.
Contributing to this good flow was also the use of visuals. Cassie incorporated quotes, which allowed the viewer to see exactly what she was trying to convey. She also used visuals that supported what was being said. No image was left on the screen too long - which also kept the interest of the viewer. Another thing Cassie did effectively was incorporating a video clip that was based off of Dorothy Allison's novel "Bastard out of Carolina." This video was very powerful and certainly grabbed the viewer's attention. It was both disturbing and eye-opening, and established a strong tone that really emphasized Dorothy's life experiences and how they come through in her writing.
The original piece was also presented very effectively. I like how Cassie gave each character their own voice - this really brought the characters to life for the viewer. I also liked the analysis of the original piece. Instead of just reading through her original piece, Cassie broke it up and read sections that applied to each individual stylistic element she was addressing. This allowed the viewer to see precisely how Dorothy uses stylistic elements and how Cassie incorporated these elements, side by side.
I don't know what else I can say about Cassie's Podcast. It was done very well. All information was relevant and presented in an interesting and easy to follow manner.
MADALINA BELOIA-CHERES!
(Roald Dahl)
Something that really stood out to me in Maddie's podcast were this images. While I admit that watching all of these podcasts (and the obnoxious amount of pictures used in each) made me want to gouge my eyes out, I honestly really enjoyed the pictures Maddie used. While describing a bit of Roald Dahl's background, she included many pictures of the man at various stages of his life. I think the reason these images struck a chord with me is that Roald Dajl has always been, to me, an author of children's literature, and therefore more a character of imagination himself. He had never really seemed real. But being introduced to Roald Dahl as a person, I found myself interested in how life had treated him and what his experiences were.
Another aspect of this podcast was Maddie's focus on using titles and book covers to accompany what she was saying. You see, for each of his books, there is a particular, characteristic illustration that many of us have grown up with. I always associate 'The Twits' with the grotesque sketch of a older, clearly maniacal character. I completely enjoyed looking at the various illustrations. For this reason, perhaps this reason alone, i was captivated by what maddie was saying.
She also added in a bit of humourous narration during the reading of her original piece. With the help of a friend, she purposefully changed her tone and the voice used to narrate or give dialogue.
***funny, cheesy, LAME ENDING MADDIE.
that is all. :)
Something that really stood out to me in Maddie's podcast were this images. While I admit that watching all of these podcasts (and the obnoxious amount of pictures used in each) made me want to gouge my eyes out, I honestly really enjoyed the pictures Maddie used. While describing a bit of Roald Dahl's background, she included many pictures of the man at various stages of his life. I think the reason these images struck a chord with me is that Roald Dajl has always been, to me, an author of children's literature, and therefore more a character of imagination himself. He had never really seemed real. But being introduced to Roald Dahl as a person, I found myself interested in how life had treated him and what his experiences were.
Another aspect of this podcast was Maddie's focus on using titles and book covers to accompany what she was saying. You see, for each of his books, there is a particular, characteristic illustration that many of us have grown up with. I always associate 'The Twits' with the grotesque sketch of a older, clearly maniacal character. I completely enjoyed looking at the various illustrations. For this reason, perhaps this reason alone, i was captivated by what maddie was saying.
She also added in a bit of humourous narration during the reading of her original piece. With the help of a friend, she purposefully changed her tone and the voice used to narrate or give dialogue.
***funny, cheesy, LAME ENDING MADDIE.
that is all. :)
OY, KRIS WEBER!
So, here's the deal with Kris Weber's podcast; it was the most original and creative submission i have seen so far. Now, he might not have had the technological genius of one Van Wickiam, but I honestly found myself enjoying his entire podcast - completely intrigued and waiting to see what he would say or do next.
Kris opened his podcast with some good old punk rock and some general nonsensical but nonetheless entertaining dancing and craziness. I was laughing from then on. Kris decided to present his podcast in a manner in which no one else did; he focused on filming his podcast rather than speaking into a microphone and having an endless series of images float by on the screen. And for that, I thank him. I was getting a bit tired of the flickering of images and accompanying voice without a face. Kris and cohort Dylan Burnett added an incredibly comical and creative aspect to his podcast presentation in this sense. The 'interview' with JK Rowling (altough part of me wants to smack Kris for manipulating her words and making her seem like a troubled and cold woman.. which she is not), was a particularly funny way to gain an insight into JKR's bio and writing background. a bit confusing at times, but funny. :)
The aspect i might have loved most about Kris' podcast was the way in which he presented his original piece. With the musical talents of Dylan by his side, Kris filmed himself reading his original piece while Dylan played the guitar, playing chords and responding to what he heard in Kris' story. I cannot stress that I don't do this aspect of his podcast justice in my review, but i assure you that while Kris' podcast incorporated all of the required information, it was arguably one of the most enjoyable to watch.
Kudos, sir.
Kris opened his podcast with some good old punk rock and some general nonsensical but nonetheless entertaining dancing and craziness. I was laughing from then on. Kris decided to present his podcast in a manner in which no one else did; he focused on filming his podcast rather than speaking into a microphone and having an endless series of images float by on the screen. And for that, I thank him. I was getting a bit tired of the flickering of images and accompanying voice without a face. Kris and cohort Dylan Burnett added an incredibly comical and creative aspect to his podcast presentation in this sense. The 'interview' with JK Rowling (altough part of me wants to smack Kris for manipulating her words and making her seem like a troubled and cold woman.. which she is not), was a particularly funny way to gain an insight into JKR's bio and writing background. a bit confusing at times, but funny. :)
The aspect i might have loved most about Kris' podcast was the way in which he presented his original piece. With the musical talents of Dylan by his side, Kris filmed himself reading his original piece while Dylan played the guitar, playing chords and responding to what he heard in Kris' story. I cannot stress that I don't do this aspect of his podcast justice in my review, but i assure you that while Kris' podcast incorporated all of the required information, it was arguably one of the most enjoyable to watch.
Kudos, sir.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Week 14
Great observations about everyone's podcasts! Just 1 more week to go! For next week, 2 posts about any podcasts that you want to watch.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Podcast- Jordan
This was an interesting podcast.
I enjoyed your historical information, and the depth of which you researched into Mr. Cummings past. Such as the examples of his earliest works. This information gave your listeners the impressing of how important writing was to his life.
It was beneficial to your listeners that you would not hold back any information about EE Cummings that might cast in an unpleasant tone.
My favourite part of your podcast is when you read your original piece. The words in the first piece flowed so easily that is got the feeling of almost a waterfall of sounds and words together. And the final line as almost notes taken by the narrator.
Hilarious references to newfies relating to drunken sailors.
You were able to emulate EE Cummings style of writing and his use of, or lack of mechanics without seeming to be a generic rip off of his particular style. This piece felt original yet still maintaining EE’s style and flare.
Good podcast.
I enjoyed your historical information, and the depth of which you researched into Mr. Cummings past. Such as the examples of his earliest works. This information gave your listeners the impressing of how important writing was to his life.
It was beneficial to your listeners that you would not hold back any information about EE Cummings that might cast in an unpleasant tone.
My favourite part of your podcast is when you read your original piece. The words in the first piece flowed so easily that is got the feeling of almost a waterfall of sounds and words together. And the final line as almost notes taken by the narrator.
Hilarious references to newfies relating to drunken sailors.
You were able to emulate EE Cummings style of writing and his use of, or lack of mechanics without seeming to be a generic rip off of his particular style. This piece felt original yet still maintaining EE’s style and flare.
Good podcast.
Podcast- Van
This was one of my favourite podcasts. You not only conveyed the necessary information to your listeners but made it fun and entertaining, I know that this is a project and that we are supposed to watch all of these podcasts, but I found your so entertaining that I would subscribe to your podcasts.
The way you introduced his history and all the back story of Charles Dickens life was very interesting and it really hooked the listener’s interest in what you had to say. The off handed style of this intro was funny as well as informative.
It was interesting how you went about explaining his style and the different aspects of his writing. And I especially like how you stated exactly what piece each element applied too.
I like your original piece; it was very reminiscent of Charles dickens style of writing with the use of run on sentences and almost a sarcastic way of stating the facts surrounding him. You were able to apply his styles without seeming to be a generic copy of his style. You employed your own creative style to the piece. Good job.
Good use of analysis of your own writing. It takes special talent to be able to pick apart your own work and analysis it. This is a talent I believe we have all learned this semester.
To close, this was a fun and very entertaining for your listeners as well as covers all the important information about Charles Dickens.
I look forward to seeing your films in the future.
The way you introduced his history and all the back story of Charles Dickens life was very interesting and it really hooked the listener’s interest in what you had to say. The off handed style of this intro was funny as well as informative.
It was interesting how you went about explaining his style and the different aspects of his writing. And I especially like how you stated exactly what piece each element applied too.
I like your original piece; it was very reminiscent of Charles dickens style of writing with the use of run on sentences and almost a sarcastic way of stating the facts surrounding him. You were able to apply his styles without seeming to be a generic copy of his style. You employed your own creative style to the piece. Good job.
Good use of analysis of your own writing. It takes special talent to be able to pick apart your own work and analysis it. This is a talent I believe we have all learned this semester.
To close, this was a fun and very entertaining for your listeners as well as covers all the important information about Charles Dickens.
I look forward to seeing your films in the future.
Podcast- Taylor
I thought it was an interesting style that you choose to represent Danielle Steele's writing. I really enjoyed listening to your views and the way your presented Danielle Steeles writing style. You not only made it interesting for the listener as well as very informative into the lives of one of the most beloved authors.
I thought that your choice of writers was excellent because she has such an interesting style and a wide variety of influences that her writing is nothing short of spectacular.
One of my favourite aspects of your podcast is the way in which you explained her novels. The step by step run thought each of her novels and telling your listeners how she applied specific styles of writing.
I thought that you had a good way of presenting her influences and how they affected her writing. The most powerful influences, and the two that I thought you best represented were the effect of her sons manic depression leading to suicide and war.
The influence of suicide was an interesting one because of its negative effects where as the technique of war had some very positive influence. This was one of the most interesting styles of writing. How war can both tear her characters apart yet still bring them closer together.
I really enjoyed listening to your piece, they style was very reminiscent of Danielle styles writing and had many of her writing characteristics but showed off your own writing style and flare.
In short i enjoyed listening and watching your podcast, you did an excellent job.
I thought that your choice of writers was excellent because she has such an interesting style and a wide variety of influences that her writing is nothing short of spectacular.
One of my favourite aspects of your podcast is the way in which you explained her novels. The step by step run thought each of her novels and telling your listeners how she applied specific styles of writing.
I thought that you had a good way of presenting her influences and how they affected her writing. The most powerful influences, and the two that I thought you best represented were the effect of her sons manic depression leading to suicide and war.
The influence of suicide was an interesting one because of its negative effects where as the technique of war had some very positive influence. This was one of the most interesting styles of writing. How war can both tear her characters apart yet still bring them closer together.
I really enjoyed listening to your piece, they style was very reminiscent of Danielle styles writing and had many of her writing characteristics but showed off your own writing style and flare.
In short i enjoyed listening and watching your podcast, you did an excellent job.
Taylor's podcast - Danielle Steele
Hey Taylor
This was interesting to watch because I really knew very little about Danielle Steele, so it was interesting to get some insight.
The video clip was very effective and gave everyone a clear view of her and her personality / outlook.
Telling us all the different stories and plotlines was also effective, I found, as it showed the wide variety of topics she tackles in the romance genre.
It was good how you showed another side to the argument, and told us about how her work can often be labelled as fluff, but then you explained why her work is more than just 'fluff' which was good.
I also really liked your original piece. My favourite portion of it was in the middle where it said 'Living, love through love, loving live for long...'
It was a really cool podcast and piece, so very good job.
This was interesting to watch because I really knew very little about Danielle Steele, so it was interesting to get some insight.
The video clip was very effective and gave everyone a clear view of her and her personality / outlook.
Telling us all the different stories and plotlines was also effective, I found, as it showed the wide variety of topics she tackles in the romance genre.
It was good how you showed another side to the argument, and told us about how her work can often be labelled as fluff, but then you explained why her work is more than just 'fluff' which was good.
I also really liked your original piece. My favourite portion of it was in the middle where it said 'Living, love through love, loving live for long...'
It was a really cool podcast and piece, so very good job.
Rebecca's Podcast - Dan Brown
Alright, Rebecca!
First off I really enjoyed the introduction you used, the little anecdote about his name being the same size as the title on the book was interesting and informative. It was cute. You also used that song clip which I thought was simultaneously really funny and sort of gave an insight into him aswell.
Your use of humour in the podcast was very nice too, like after playing the song clip saying 'surprisingly enough he didn't continue in music'... I actually laughed.
Its interesting that he wrote a book from a womans perspective and using a female pen name... especially one about finding the right man or whatever it was. It just struck me as odd.
The ties between the writing style and his influences were very clear which was nice. The clarity of the podcast in general was nice.
The background music was very very subtle yet still played a big part in setting the tone, which was cool. I really liked your original piece and I thought the fact that you got your dad to do the guys lines really helped set the tone as it was creepy and haunting and engaging. :)
You also did a very good job of explaining how you emulated Dan Brown's style.
So overall, very good job, I enjoyed watching your podcast :)
First off I really enjoyed the introduction you used, the little anecdote about his name being the same size as the title on the book was interesting and informative. It was cute. You also used that song clip which I thought was simultaneously really funny and sort of gave an insight into him aswell.
Your use of humour in the podcast was very nice too, like after playing the song clip saying 'surprisingly enough he didn't continue in music'... I actually laughed.
Its interesting that he wrote a book from a womans perspective and using a female pen name... especially one about finding the right man or whatever it was. It just struck me as odd.
The ties between the writing style and his influences were very clear which was nice. The clarity of the podcast in general was nice.
The background music was very very subtle yet still played a big part in setting the tone, which was cool. I really liked your original piece and I thought the fact that you got your dad to do the guys lines really helped set the tone as it was creepy and haunting and engaging. :)
You also did a very good job of explaining how you emulated Dan Brown's style.
So overall, very good job, I enjoyed watching your podcast :)
Diana's Podcast - Margaret Atwood
I loved the style in which you decided to tackle the podcast, making it flow like a real podcast might. It was cute and I loved how legitimate it felt, almost even like a radio show.
From the very introduction I was intrigued, your expressive voice made it a pleasure to listen to. You used excellent expressions and kept the podcast captivating. To be honest I didn't know very much about Margaret Atwood, so learning some of the inspiration behind her was really interesting, like about her living in quebec and exploring the wild. You usage of humour in addressing the intimidating figure she is was also very funny and kept it interesting.
I also liked the video clip and thought it was effective, I kind of want to watch that movie now!
The pictures you used were also relevant and funny and kept me interested, although that one picture at 7:50 was disgusting though!!!!! :( :( :( Why would you subject us to that?
I joke, it was relevant to the topic matter and built the tone. Still really creepy though.
The way of incorporating your original piece was also excellent! It flowed really nicely. The atmosphere you created through reading your piece with the pulsing heartbeat in the background was gorgeous! Very captivating and interesting, it really set the tone for your piece. I loved it!
I also loved your writing and imagery you used, it was very effective.
Good job DHALL, I really enjoyed this podcast :)
From the very introduction I was intrigued, your expressive voice made it a pleasure to listen to. You used excellent expressions and kept the podcast captivating. To be honest I didn't know very much about Margaret Atwood, so learning some of the inspiration behind her was really interesting, like about her living in quebec and exploring the wild. You usage of humour in addressing the intimidating figure she is was also very funny and kept it interesting.
I also liked the video clip and thought it was effective, I kind of want to watch that movie now!
The pictures you used were also relevant and funny and kept me interested, although that one picture at 7:50 was disgusting though!!!!! :( :( :( Why would you subject us to that?
I joke, it was relevant to the topic matter and built the tone. Still really creepy though.
The way of incorporating your original piece was also excellent! It flowed really nicely. The atmosphere you created through reading your piece with the pulsing heartbeat in the background was gorgeous! Very captivating and interesting, it really set the tone for your piece. I loved it!
I also loved your writing and imagery you used, it was very effective.
Good job DHALL, I really enjoyed this podcast :)
Thursday, January 14, 2010
RE: le podcast de Rebecca
ah. Dan Brown. I just realized that i own every one of his books, but have only mustered enough energy to read angels and demons as well as the Da Vinci Code. I think i'll have to check out the lost symbol, though. keep the Langdon tradition going! :P
*ahem* ANYWAY, onto your podcast! Something i noticed and thanked you soooo much for SPEAKING CLEARLY AND SLOWLY! i heard each and every word you said in this podcast, which gave me the opportunity to reflect upon what i was learning as you spoke. I didn't feel like anything was overwhelming. i'm glad you took the risk (in order to meet the requirements) to give direct examples of Dan Brown's writing on-screen. I was afraid to do that so often in my own podcast, but i feel that it worked well with yours. I was able to read the passages on my own time and listen to your explanations and analysis without confusion!
OH and before i forget, the way you introduced your author at the very beginning of the novel (relating to the size of the title/byline text) was very clever! i laughed. :) people turned to look at me as i did so in the resource centre... oh well.
i really thought that the change of tone and addition of another voice for the characters/narration of your original piece made the reading all the more effective. I really feel that that extra voice added to the over tone of the reading, making ti all the more enjoyable to listen to.
All in all, you've put a lot of time into this podcast, and it shows! you clearly explained each and every aspect of Dan Brown's writing (as well as your own) and made your podcast very easy to follow and to-the-point.
another great job on yet another gruelling requirement for this class. you glide through this last year, well done!!!
*ahem* ANYWAY, onto your podcast! Something i noticed and thanked you soooo much for SPEAKING CLEARLY AND SLOWLY! i heard each and every word you said in this podcast, which gave me the opportunity to reflect upon what i was learning as you spoke. I didn't feel like anything was overwhelming. i'm glad you took the risk (in order to meet the requirements) to give direct examples of Dan Brown's writing on-screen. I was afraid to do that so often in my own podcast, but i feel that it worked well with yours. I was able to read the passages on my own time and listen to your explanations and analysis without confusion!
OH and before i forget, the way you introduced your author at the very beginning of the novel (relating to the size of the title/byline text) was very clever! i laughed. :) people turned to look at me as i did so in the resource centre... oh well.
i really thought that the change of tone and addition of another voice for the characters/narration of your original piece made the reading all the more effective. I really feel that that extra voice added to the over tone of the reading, making ti all the more enjoyable to listen to.
All in all, you've put a lot of time into this podcast, and it shows! you clearly explained each and every aspect of Dan Brown's writing (as well as your own) and made your podcast very easy to follow and to-the-point.
another great job on yet another gruelling requirement for this class. you glide through this last year, well done!!!
RE: le podcast de JordanPike
HEY JORDAN!
May I just first comment on the consistent tone, which although didn't vary much in regards to emotion, i feel that the contrast between your gentle, unvarying tone and the eccentricities you pointed out in your poet and his work, was quite effective. I enjoyed listening to your relaxing tone - and enjoyed the woman's voice even more as the utter emotion and raw human passion during the reading of Cummings' first poem featured in your piece. I felt like I was compeltely being swept away by the reading - i could've fallen asleep (in a good way, i promise!) listening to the sweet poem. The arrangement of the words in this particular poem was not overpowering or overwhelming, as i find some of Cummings' pieces are. They can be intimidating (depending on whether or not the reader takes understanding from it), so i found this 'lead in' very effective.
I liked how you explained Cummings' growth as a writer, particularly when you describe how he didn't trust editors after a blunder in his published work. On a personal note, i found that very interesting to come to know about E.E. Cummings.
I must also comment on your use of music, which captivated me from the start of your podcast. They were very fitting choices, in my opinion, as the music was not overpowering or distracting. The points at which you chose to change the music was also very clever; separated, if i remember correctly, by a clever break of silence.
Your original pieces were very much in the style of E.E Cummings, and i especially liked the fact that you incorporated your own sense of humour into your pieces. The only thing i couldn't read was the part about scattered confetti... but I LOVED THE "shmellsshlike.." ACCENT! BAHHHH!
anyway, i very much enjoyed your analysis of Cummings' work. well done! :)
May I just first comment on the consistent tone, which although didn't vary much in regards to emotion, i feel that the contrast between your gentle, unvarying tone and the eccentricities you pointed out in your poet and his work, was quite effective. I enjoyed listening to your relaxing tone - and enjoyed the woman's voice even more as the utter emotion and raw human passion during the reading of Cummings' first poem featured in your piece. I felt like I was compeltely being swept away by the reading - i could've fallen asleep (in a good way, i promise!) listening to the sweet poem. The arrangement of the words in this particular poem was not overpowering or overwhelming, as i find some of Cummings' pieces are. They can be intimidating (depending on whether or not the reader takes understanding from it), so i found this 'lead in' very effective.
I liked how you explained Cummings' growth as a writer, particularly when you describe how he didn't trust editors after a blunder in his published work. On a personal note, i found that very interesting to come to know about E.E. Cummings.
I must also comment on your use of music, which captivated me from the start of your podcast. They were very fitting choices, in my opinion, as the music was not overpowering or distracting. The points at which you chose to change the music was also very clever; separated, if i remember correctly, by a clever break of silence.
Your original pieces were very much in the style of E.E Cummings, and i especially liked the fact that you incorporated your own sense of humour into your pieces. The only thing i couldn't read was the part about scattered confetti... but I LOVED THE "shmellsshlike.." ACCENT! BAHHHH!
anyway, i very much enjoyed your analysis of Cummings' work. well done! :)
RE: le podcast de Van
VAN!
I was immediately intrigued by the manner in which you decided to introduce viewers to your podcast subject, Charles Dickens. Now, i'm aware that i'm stating the obvious by refering to this particular portion as quite a creative way to go through some of the arguably more bland requirements of this podcast... the dreaded 'brief biography'. I found myself relaxed and already enjoying the piece - which was a lovely way to start off my *ahem* Podcast Viewing Experience.
Your transitions, use of images and incorporation of video clips made yoru podcast veyr interesting to watch. Referring back to that single portrait of Charles Dickens made your content easier to follow, and how easily you moved from picture to picture and topic to topic was icnredibly smooth. However, it was your use of video that really made an impression on me. instead of focusing on images (which is sort of what i expected from most podcasts), you decided to rely heavily on film adaptations of Dickens' characters. I felt that this worked extremely well, because viewers would be able to better identify with these 'lifelike' characters. I found myself also trying to guess which movie was which... (which jsut made watching your podcast all the more interesting).
All in all, your use of characteristic tone, flawless and complimentary changes in the background music and use of images all created a podcast worth watching. I feel that i have a much greater, clearer understanding of Charles Dickens.
*PS Great use of humour. well done. :)
"resume being deceased. farewell "<--- SO FUNNY AHH
I was immediately intrigued by the manner in which you decided to introduce viewers to your podcast subject, Charles Dickens. Now, i'm aware that i'm stating the obvious by refering to this particular portion as quite a creative way to go through some of the arguably more bland requirements of this podcast... the dreaded 'brief biography'. I found myself relaxed and already enjoying the piece - which was a lovely way to start off my *ahem* Podcast Viewing Experience.
Your transitions, use of images and incorporation of video clips made yoru podcast veyr interesting to watch. Referring back to that single portrait of Charles Dickens made your content easier to follow, and how easily you moved from picture to picture and topic to topic was icnredibly smooth. However, it was your use of video that really made an impression on me. instead of focusing on images (which is sort of what i expected from most podcasts), you decided to rely heavily on film adaptations of Dickens' characters. I felt that this worked extremely well, because viewers would be able to better identify with these 'lifelike' characters. I found myself also trying to guess which movie was which... (which jsut made watching your podcast all the more interesting).
All in all, your use of characteristic tone, flawless and complimentary changes in the background music and use of images all created a podcast worth watching. I feel that i have a much greater, clearer understanding of Charles Dickens.
*PS Great use of humour. well done. :)
"resume being deceased. farewell "<--- SO FUNNY AHH
Taylor's Podcast
First off, great job taylor!
I didn't know this author prior to your podcast and was delighted to learn all about Danielle Steele. The way you highlighted Steele was really interesting, and it kept me intrigued throughout your podcast. You went through a variety of things that truly brought Steele to life in your podcast, you did a great job at bringing the author to life through what you were saying but also with your visuals.
Your original piece was great, I really enjoy your writing style, and it was great paired with Steele's style. You did a great job at replicating the authors work from what you had taught us.
Overall, you did a really good job at presenting a podcast that kept me intrigued and also informed me :)
I didn't know this author prior to your podcast and was delighted to learn all about Danielle Steele. The way you highlighted Steele was really interesting, and it kept me intrigued throughout your podcast. You went through a variety of things that truly brought Steele to life in your podcast, you did a great job at bringing the author to life through what you were saying but also with your visuals.
Your original piece was great, I really enjoy your writing style, and it was great paired with Steele's style. You did a great job at replicating the authors work from what you had taught us.
Overall, you did a really good job at presenting a podcast that kept me intrigued and also informed me :)
Jordan's Podcast
Jordan, you've got a great talking voice, and that really aided this podcast for obvious reasons. No one ever wants to listen to an annoying voice that just drones on, but that isn't the case here.
I said this about Diana's and I'll say about yours as well, just because it's so important, your podcast did a great job that carrying a consistent throughout it. Consistency is key to success in media like this. Your presentation of ee cummings was really good, he is quite the interesting guy and I really enjoyed the pieces featured in the podcast, it was really enjoyable.
I really found your original pieces a powerful part of this podcast, if not the most powerful, the presentation and content were excellent, you were able to capture cummings style while incorporating your own style which really defined this podcast as great.
Great job Jordan !
I said this about Diana's and I'll say about yours as well, just because it's so important, your podcast did a great job that carrying a consistent throughout it. Consistency is key to success in media like this. Your presentation of ee cummings was really good, he is quite the interesting guy and I really enjoyed the pieces featured in the podcast, it was really enjoyable.
I really found your original pieces a powerful part of this podcast, if not the most powerful, the presentation and content were excellent, you were able to capture cummings style while incorporating your own style which really defined this podcast as great.
Great job Jordan !
Diana's Podcast
This podcast grabbed my attention immediately with a really powerful introduction that set the tone for the podcast that was consistent throughout it. You did a great job at creating a podcast that had a real polished and professional tone that made it seem like an authentic tone. You achieved this with your consistency.
The introduction to Atwood was great and truly did justice to her, really capturing who Atwood really is. This set the tone for how the rest of the podcast was going to play itself out in terms of information. In that aspect, you did an excellent job at communicating the information, regardless of whether it was relevant or not. However, all of your information was relevant, so you did a great job on both sides, entertaining and informing.
I really enjoyed this podcast simply based on the fact it entertained and informed, it wasn't over the top and in your face, it was laid back and mellow yet really informative and I walked knowing Margaret much better.
Your original piece was great, I enjoyed your selection of SFx, once again not over the top, or in your face, you didn't force anything, you let us feel it for ourselves. The piece itself was quite well written too!
Overall, you did a great job Diana, as always, and as expected.
The introduction to Atwood was great and truly did justice to her, really capturing who Atwood really is. This set the tone for how the rest of the podcast was going to play itself out in terms of information. In that aspect, you did an excellent job at communicating the information, regardless of whether it was relevant or not. However, all of your information was relevant, so you did a great job on both sides, entertaining and informing.
I really enjoyed this podcast simply based on the fact it entertained and informed, it wasn't over the top and in your face, it was laid back and mellow yet really informative and I walked knowing Margaret much better.
Your original piece was great, I enjoyed your selection of SFx, once again not over the top, or in your face, you didn't force anything, you let us feel it for ourselves. The piece itself was quite well written too!
Overall, you did a great job Diana, as always, and as expected.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Re: Diana's Podcast - Margaret Atwood
Diana- I think you incorporated your background in theatre in your podcast. You had a good flow to your speaking, that maintained the viewer's interest. You also used intonation to create a smooth flow, and emphasize the key points. Each of your influences and stylistic elements was clearly addressed, and I could easily follow each point.
You also maintained the viewer's interest with the use of visuals; no visual was left on the screen for too long. However, at times I was confused as to how the visual supported what was being said. But, these visuals did not distract from what was being said. The most important thing about the podcast is that the information is effectively conveyed - and it was. Your voice clearly read the facts and quotes, and the visuals on the screen did not distract from that. I also like how you used multi-media, by using videos, quotes and still photos that enhanced the quality of your presentation. The theme of female empowerment was present throughout the presentation - which really supports the style of Maragret Atwood. Your visuals, and strong tone of voice, supported this theme.
Having read a novel by Margaret Atwood, I could easily tell that your original piece was an effective imitation of her writing. You were so descriptive, that even though I wasn't reading the words, I could visualize the scene. It also had a very dystopian tone, that I could clearly see the connection to "The Handmaid's Tale."
Basically, I have nothing but praise for your work. Everything was presented clearly, and the interest of the viewer was maintained.
Good work.
You also maintained the viewer's interest with the use of visuals; no visual was left on the screen for too long. However, at times I was confused as to how the visual supported what was being said. But, these visuals did not distract from what was being said. The most important thing about the podcast is that the information is effectively conveyed - and it was. Your voice clearly read the facts and quotes, and the visuals on the screen did not distract from that. I also like how you used multi-media, by using videos, quotes and still photos that enhanced the quality of your presentation. The theme of female empowerment was present throughout the presentation - which really supports the style of Maragret Atwood. Your visuals, and strong tone of voice, supported this theme.
Having read a novel by Margaret Atwood, I could easily tell that your original piece was an effective imitation of her writing. You were so descriptive, that even though I wasn't reading the words, I could visualize the scene. It also had a very dystopian tone, that I could clearly see the connection to "The Handmaid's Tale."
Basically, I have nothing but praise for your work. Everything was presented clearly, and the interest of the viewer was maintained.
Good work.
Re: Van's Podcast - Charles Dickens
Van - First of all, I’m going to state the obvious in saying that presenting the author’s biography in first person was very creative and enhanced the presentation. This unique intro captured the viewers interest immediately.
The use of visuals in this podcast was also effective. The visuals supported what was being said, making it easy for the audience to follow. However, I felt that the clips from the movies were at times distracting (albeit not nearly as distracting as the video shown in the sample podcast) – but this is largely due to how I did not know where these clips were coming from. Its an easy assumption that they are from Charles Dickens movie adaptations, but having not read all of his novels, I did not know the relevance of the videos being shown. It would have been more effective to include visuals that supported what was being said directly. Other than the videos, the visuals were effective in supporting the facts presented.
The only other thing that was of concern for me, was the fact that the music – although it was good music – was too loud. (But this may have just been for my headphones - if its fine for everyone else then disregard this comment :S )There were many times when it overpowered your voice and I could scarcely hear what was being said. It is possible that this low audio is what made me feel distracted by the videos. When I couldn’t hear what was being said, I would start paying more attention to the videos, in hopes of grasping what was being said. Thus, when the visual did not enhance what was being said, certain facts were lost in the music.
Nonetheless, I really enjoyed this podcast. You definitely used technology to your advantage.
PS Sorry if i contradicted myself, I hope you understand what I'm saying ;P
Good work.
The use of visuals in this podcast was also effective. The visuals supported what was being said, making it easy for the audience to follow. However, I felt that the clips from the movies were at times distracting (albeit not nearly as distracting as the video shown in the sample podcast) – but this is largely due to how I did not know where these clips were coming from. Its an easy assumption that they are from Charles Dickens movie adaptations, but having not read all of his novels, I did not know the relevance of the videos being shown. It would have been more effective to include visuals that supported what was being said directly. Other than the videos, the visuals were effective in supporting the facts presented.
The only other thing that was of concern for me, was the fact that the music – although it was good music – was too loud. (But this may have just been for my headphones - if its fine for everyone else then disregard this comment :S )There were many times when it overpowered your voice and I could scarcely hear what was being said. It is possible that this low audio is what made me feel distracted by the videos. When I couldn’t hear what was being said, I would start paying more attention to the videos, in hopes of grasping what was being said. Thus, when the visual did not enhance what was being said, certain facts were lost in the music.
Nonetheless, I really enjoyed this podcast. You definitely used technology to your advantage.
PS Sorry if i contradicted myself, I hope you understand what I'm saying ;P
Good work.
Re: Jordan's Podcast - E E Cummings
Jordan - I really liked your podcast. Almost immediately, a great tone was established. It was very soft and coordinated well with the gentle tone of poetry. This tone was maintained throughout the entire podcast. This was demonstrated with the reading of the poem 'I carry your heart'. Using a female’s voice made the reading of the poem more sentimental and enforced the gentle tone. (And as a side note, I absolutely loved that poem).
I also enjoyed your original pieces. I like how you showed them on the screen, instead of just reading them; because you don’t truly get the full effect of Cumming’s unique style unless you see it. However, I also felt that if you had shown the ‘lover’s heart’ poem as it appears, the viewer may have gotten a stronger sense of Cumming’s style. This is not to say that the way you presented it was ineffective, as I feel that the visuals also added to the gentle tone. It is possible that if you had simply shown the poem as it appears, it wouldn’t have had the same visual appeal that it did.
I also feel that it was very effective to include a poem as read by E E Cummings, himself. This really helped the viewer understand the tone that he was trying to convey. Including this enforced the stylistic elements he uses because it allows the viewer to see firsthand Cumming’s desired effect through his unusual style.
Overall, I feel that your podcast was effective. The information was appropriate and was conveyed in a factual manner that was enhanced with the use of visuals. The methods used maintained the viewer’s interest. Good work :)
I also enjoyed your original pieces. I like how you showed them on the screen, instead of just reading them; because you don’t truly get the full effect of Cumming’s unique style unless you see it. However, I also felt that if you had shown the ‘lover’s heart’ poem as it appears, the viewer may have gotten a stronger sense of Cumming’s style. This is not to say that the way you presented it was ineffective, as I feel that the visuals also added to the gentle tone. It is possible that if you had simply shown the poem as it appears, it wouldn’t have had the same visual appeal that it did.
I also feel that it was very effective to include a poem as read by E E Cummings, himself. This really helped the viewer understand the tone that he was trying to convey. Including this enforced the stylistic elements he uses because it allows the viewer to see firsthand Cumming’s desired effect through his unusual style.
Overall, I feel that your podcast was effective. The information was appropriate and was conveyed in a factual manner that was enhanced with the use of visuals. The methods used maintained the viewer’s interest. Good work :)
Monday, January 11, 2010
Week 13
Hey guys!
So, week 13 is over, and we're done with ISU etc. For next week's blogs, we'll watch 3 podcasts from our group and we'll post 3 responses from our blog group. We'll post by next Monday at 8:00.
So, week 13 is over, and we're done with ISU etc. For next week's blogs, we'll watch 3 podcasts from our group and we'll post 3 responses from our blog group. We'll post by next Monday at 8:00.
D-d-d-diet?
Ew.
Hate that word.
It's not because of the fact that it generally means cutting back on some of those delicious treats, but because of the structure! I want to eat what I want, when I want regardless of whether it's healthy for me. Sadly, I have no control over this, or at least for the next two weeks. I'm doing a cleansing.....That just sounds exciting doesn't it? Yummmmm, asparagus, broccoli, mushrooms, onions.....peppers and lots and lots of salad. The worst part of this whole cleansing, is that a couple days after I'm done, it's my birthday! So i'm going to stuck on my birthday counting calories, while eveyrone else around me is noming on some delicious cake that probably has my name on it! WHat kind sick world is this where you can't eat a piece of cake that has your name on it :'(
Oh well, it's for the best! The road to a healthier me is quite rocky, but at least I know it's pretty straightforward! We'll be done this class by the time i'm done phase 1 of this diet, sad isn't it? Saying goodbye to this blog :(.....ok maybe it's not all that sad =D
Hate that word.
It's not because of the fact that it generally means cutting back on some of those delicious treats, but because of the structure! I want to eat what I want, when I want regardless of whether it's healthy for me. Sadly, I have no control over this, or at least for the next two weeks. I'm doing a cleansing.....That just sounds exciting doesn't it? Yummmmm, asparagus, broccoli, mushrooms, onions.....peppers and lots and lots of salad. The worst part of this whole cleansing, is that a couple days after I'm done, it's my birthday! So i'm going to stuck on my birthday counting calories, while eveyrone else around me is noming on some delicious cake that probably has my name on it! WHat kind sick world is this where you can't eat a piece of cake that has your name on it :'(
Oh well, it's for the best! The road to a healthier me is quite rocky, but at least I know it's pretty straightforward! We'll be done this class by the time i'm done phase 1 of this diet, sad isn't it? Saying goodbye to this blog :(.....ok maybe it's not all that sad =D
E.E. Cummings
So thank god I picked an author that I liked for my project or I'd be ready to shrivel up and die right about now. So I made 5 original pieces, and featured 2 of them in my podcast as I thought they would be simpler and easier to explain.
However, I prefer my other three, and so I figured I'd post one now.
The other ones wouldn't post, as blogger was messing up the weird formatting, so I just went with this one.
******************************
debauchery! tasting of
salt (& bruised-flesh)
the warMTH of
(,hiding, in)
your MouTH.
through (i’m)
the tonic-s(hit)-stained-s.cum-hole
of a hotelroom.
youheldme
.and it was ok
****************************
So what do you think?
Just figured that this would be a good way to end my cummings filled week.
However, I prefer my other three, and so I figured I'd post one now.
The other ones wouldn't post, as blogger was messing up the weird formatting, so I just went with this one.
******************************
debauchery! tasting of
salt (& bruised-flesh)
the warMTH of
(,hiding, in)
your MouTH.
through (i’m)
the tonic-s(hit)-stained-s.cum-hole
of a hotelroom.
youheldme
.and it was ok
****************************
So what do you think?
Just figured that this would be a good way to end my cummings filled week.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
My love has gone astray
Hey guys, long time, no blog.
So today i spent almost the entire day at the Hershey Kiss centre, for a synchro competition.
and i know that 99.999999% of you will not understand this but, i decided to blog about it, because the world has flipped. Well not the World, but my world.
Something that we can usually count on is rules, and that are set in place for a reason. They are there to protect us, possible from ourselves, but they are put there for a good reason.
Today, the rules were broken and no judge seems to give a F***. In synchro the highest and most prestigious level of skating is called Senior. They do the hardest moves, are most technically advanced skating and have the best skating skills. If you can win anything in senior, you basically won an Oscar or the Stanley cup. Its that hard.
Today, teams in every category of skating, were trying to be a Senior team. The rules that arevset out for our own protection (because we aren't senior teams) state that we should not be doing these moves, we just don't have that level of skill, and that we would probable hurt ourselves. But the judges didn't seem to care, in fact they mark you up if you broke the rules. You break the rules, and are going to get rewarded for doing it.
As with anything in life, we respond to a name more than the person behind it. I don't care about Robert Pattinson or Nick Jonas, I care about NEXXICE, Gold Ice, and Les Supreme. They are true rock stars to me, because the have earned their prestige through hard work. These are World Champions and the most important synchro clubs in Canada. But with that comes a ton of BS. Names are one thing, but i also care about what you do today, what yhou do today makes more of a difference than your scores 10 years ago. Three years ago, Gold Ice was the best synchro team in Canada, now they are ranked 4th. The only thing that has kept them close to the top is their name. A name, not their skill or their talent, but their name. The name has been their shield for fare to long and today it came down and the judges got to see what i have seen for the last year. That they are no longer the power house they once were, and should be marked based on skating skill.
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE THIS SPORT! I have dedicated almost a decade of my life to skating synchro, and love it more than anything else in the world and if i don't stop talking now then I'm going to keep talking for the rest of the day.
have a good weekend and good luck on the podpasts.
So today i spent almost the entire day at the Hershey Kiss centre, for a synchro competition.
and i know that 99.999999% of you will not understand this but, i decided to blog about it, because the world has flipped. Well not the World, but my world.
Something that we can usually count on is rules, and that are set in place for a reason. They are there to protect us, possible from ourselves, but they are put there for a good reason.
Today, the rules were broken and no judge seems to give a F***. In synchro the highest and most prestigious level of skating is called Senior. They do the hardest moves, are most technically advanced skating and have the best skating skills. If you can win anything in senior, you basically won an Oscar or the Stanley cup. Its that hard.
Today, teams in every category of skating, were trying to be a Senior team. The rules that arevset out for our own protection (because we aren't senior teams) state that we should not be doing these moves, we just don't have that level of skill, and that we would probable hurt ourselves. But the judges didn't seem to care, in fact they mark you up if you broke the rules. You break the rules, and are going to get rewarded for doing it.
As with anything in life, we respond to a name more than the person behind it. I don't care about Robert Pattinson or Nick Jonas, I care about NEXXICE, Gold Ice, and Les Supreme. They are true rock stars to me, because the have earned their prestige through hard work. These are World Champions and the most important synchro clubs in Canada. But with that comes a ton of BS. Names are one thing, but i also care about what you do today, what yhou do today makes more of a difference than your scores 10 years ago. Three years ago, Gold Ice was the best synchro team in Canada, now they are ranked 4th. The only thing that has kept them close to the top is their name. A name, not their skill or their talent, but their name. The name has been their shield for fare to long and today it came down and the judges got to see what i have seen for the last year. That they are no longer the power house they once were, and should be marked based on skating skill.
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE THIS SPORT! I have dedicated almost a decade of my life to skating synchro, and love it more than anything else in the world and if i don't stop talking now then I'm going to keep talking for the rest of the day.
have a good weekend and good luck on the podpasts.
Jazz.
Jazz.
It's such a cool word type wise, and sounds awesome too.
Recently, I found myself falling in love with Jazz, the smooth saxes, the subtle drums, the echo of the high hats, and the gentle melodies of the piano keys.
When I was younger, I always had hated jazz, i found it dull and boring, it seemed so pointless. I thought, 'what good is a song if isn't exciting! More guitar! More Bass! More cowbell!' However, I've come to respect Jazz and it's laid back sound. If Jazz was a person, they'd be that friend thats always fashionably late, and seem quite apathetic to the little things around them, but are aware, and caring. Ohhhhhhhhh Jazz. To be honest, I think I have a bit of a crush on Jazz, it's just so calming, and powerful yet so low key. Theres this comforting element in listening to Jazz that is matched by none. You need to be patient to enjoy Jazz, and paitence is a virtue, I guess that would make Jazz virtuous! I love the really warm and relaxed Jazz, typically the slower Jazz, but I don't mind the funkier Jazz.
What do you guys think about Jazz? Do you have the patience for this genre? Or is just too dull for you? I kinda feel more sophiscated while listneing to Jazz, as if I belong in some upscale club, sipping on scotch and eating 20 dollar bite size chocolates. What are your thoughts?
It's such a cool word type wise, and sounds awesome too.
Recently, I found myself falling in love with Jazz, the smooth saxes, the subtle drums, the echo of the high hats, and the gentle melodies of the piano keys.
When I was younger, I always had hated jazz, i found it dull and boring, it seemed so pointless. I thought, 'what good is a song if isn't exciting! More guitar! More Bass! More cowbell!' However, I've come to respect Jazz and it's laid back sound. If Jazz was a person, they'd be that friend thats always fashionably late, and seem quite apathetic to the little things around them, but are aware, and caring. Ohhhhhhhhh Jazz. To be honest, I think I have a bit of a crush on Jazz, it's just so calming, and powerful yet so low key. Theres this comforting element in listening to Jazz that is matched by none. You need to be patient to enjoy Jazz, and paitence is a virtue, I guess that would make Jazz virtuous! I love the really warm and relaxed Jazz, typically the slower Jazz, but I don't mind the funkier Jazz.
What do you guys think about Jazz? Do you have the patience for this genre? Or is just too dull for you? I kinda feel more sophiscated while listneing to Jazz, as if I belong in some upscale club, sipping on scotch and eating 20 dollar bite size chocolates. What are your thoughts?
Friday, January 8, 2010
MATHPOWER 9
This is my free write #11, the found poetry.
All the lines were pulled frm a Math textbook
Care has been taken
An important part of learning
Solve the real-world problem
Use what you have learned
Powerful when it is applied
An understanding of what you have
A short way to write
Think of positives
We can extend
The following rule
To raise a power
The beginning of an experiment
Two territories combined
The most endangered of all
Constantly watching
The threat to their safety
Games won
Games lost
All the lines were pulled frm a Math textbook
Care has been taken
An important part of learning
Solve the real-world problem
Use what you have learned
Powerful when it is applied
An understanding of what you have
A short way to write
Think of positives
We can extend
The following rule
To raise a power
The beginning of an experiment
Two territories combined
The most endangered of all
Constantly watching
The threat to their safety
Games won
Games lost
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Felix Felicis
Today I am happy.
The world seems brighter,
And the skies seem clearer.
I feel much lighter,
And my goals seem nearer.
Things are going my way,
And others are more polite.
It feels like a good day,
And my decisions feel right.
My problems are gone now,
And I feel care free:
No fear in my heart, or sweat on my brow.
And every thing is fine by me.
I won't make a mistake,
As a path is laid before me.
I finally feel awake,
Like I can finally see.
I will hold on to this feeling,
(Because I know it won't last)
My mind will start reeling;
Happiness a thing of the past.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, so I know this poem is quite random. It kinda bothers me... its almost too happy. But I was in a good mood when I wrote it, and felt like writing something cheerful. Then I started talking to my sister about Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, and I thought of the potion (Felix Felicis) Harry drank that gave him good luck. This poem is - in a sense- about how you would feel if you drank that potion, and everything seems clear.
So what are your thoughts? Suggestions? Do you think the ending takes away from the optimistic and positive outlook that is present in the rest of the poem? Do you think the fact that I broke the pattern/repetition in the last two stanzas takes away from the poem? I also feel that the line "No fear in my heart, or sweat on my brow," takes away from the flow of the poem, but I can't think of a way to fix it - suggestions? Any criticisms would be appreciated.
The world seems brighter,
And the skies seem clearer.
I feel much lighter,
And my goals seem nearer.
Things are going my way,
And others are more polite.
It feels like a good day,
And my decisions feel right.
My problems are gone now,
And I feel care free:
No fear in my heart, or sweat on my brow.
And every thing is fine by me.
I won't make a mistake,
As a path is laid before me.
I finally feel awake,
Like I can finally see.
I will hold on to this feeling,
(Because I know it won't last)
My mind will start reeling;
Happiness a thing of the past.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, so I know this poem is quite random. It kinda bothers me... its almost too happy. But I was in a good mood when I wrote it, and felt like writing something cheerful. Then I started talking to my sister about Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, and I thought of the potion (Felix Felicis) Harry drank that gave him good luck. This poem is - in a sense- about how you would feel if you drank that potion, and everything seems clear.
So what are your thoughts? Suggestions? Do you think the ending takes away from the optimistic and positive outlook that is present in the rest of the poem? Do you think the fact that I broke the pattern/repetition in the last two stanzas takes away from the poem? I also feel that the line "No fear in my heart, or sweat on my brow," takes away from the flow of the poem, but I can't think of a way to fix it - suggestions? Any criticisms would be appreciated.
:D
Resolution
The New Year has already begun. We've been back at school for nearly a week already, and it feels like the break never existed. I sunk back into my routine with comfortable ease. And it seems as though the New Year has started just like any other. But this year will definitely be like no year we've ever experienced before...
Every year before the stroke of midnight on New Year's Eve, everyone gladly announces their New Year's Resolution. And you always hear the same things:
I'm going to lose weight this year...
I'm going to eat healthier this year...
I'm going to quit smoking...
I'm going to exercise more...
To bring my grades up... to watch less TV...to spend more time with family... BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Resolutions are definitely lacking originality. Personally, I did not have a resolution ready for the stroke of midnight. But as I look ahead at the year before us, I have developed my own resolution...
This year is going to be a new beginning for all of us. We're going to face good times, stressful times and exciting times. After all, this year we have to apply to University, worry about acceptances, Prom, Grad, and of course going where ever you choose to go next year. A new beginning awaits us.
I am looking forward to this year, and all that we're going to face. We're all in this together, and I'm grateful for that. But because we're looking into so many new things, I decided to center my goal of the new year around the unknowns we face this year.
My New Year's Resolution is to embrace uncertainty.
What's yours?
Every year before the stroke of midnight on New Year's Eve, everyone gladly announces their New Year's Resolution. And you always hear the same things:
I'm going to lose weight this year...
I'm going to eat healthier this year...
I'm going to quit smoking...
I'm going to exercise more...
To bring my grades up... to watch less TV...to spend more time with family... BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Resolutions are definitely lacking originality. Personally, I did not have a resolution ready for the stroke of midnight. But as I look ahead at the year before us, I have developed my own resolution...
This year is going to be a new beginning for all of us. We're going to face good times, stressful times and exciting times. After all, this year we have to apply to University, worry about acceptances, Prom, Grad, and of course going where ever you choose to go next year. A new beginning awaits us.
I am looking forward to this year, and all that we're going to face. We're all in this together, and I'm grateful for that. But because we're looking into so many new things, I decided to center my goal of the new year around the unknowns we face this year.
My New Year's Resolution is to embrace uncertainty.
What's yours?
Title?
The name’s Bond. James Bond. The music to the James Bond movies plays in my head. But no, not for Sean Connery, not for Timothy Dalton, George Lazenby, Pierce Brosnan, Roger Moore or Daniel Craig, it was for Mrs. Abbott. She exited room 213 and the primary children shook in their shoes. Actually, I wouldn’t even say exited, that sounds too graceful, too proper. Mrs. Abbott did nothing gracefully, nothing you would consider normal. This woman was huge. Okay my apologies for the contradictions, but woman may not be the most correct word. I wouldn’t even refer to her as Mrs. If I didn’t have to. This thing was massive. I’m talking 5 foot 9 and at least 275. She wore the most hideous black skirts covering from mid stomach to breast height-can’t really tell what is stomach and what is breast, to her toes. It is big enough that it doesn’t cling to anything, which means it is enormous, and her massive man feet spread bull-legged out the bottom. She walks like she has hip replacements and back surgery every morning before she gets up. Her top half is normally covered in one 2XL turtle neck of either maroon, forest green, navy blue or black wool. The turtle neck was frumpy and thick and absolutely hideous. And it made you question what she was hiding under all of that. Oh and then you can not bear to understand that pain and fear caused to all of those which she makes eye contact with. MY GOD she’s atrocious. A monster, to say the least. She has dark, almost blackened teeth from her 4 coffee daily routines. And I only see her seven out of the 24 hours in a day so who knows how many more she gobbles up. Her frozen snarl that never leaves her flattened face. Her nose that droops down over her top lip and looks like it was smashed in by a frying pan. And her eyes, the greenest eyes I have ever seen. And no I am not talking gorgeous hazels or intriguing aqua’s. Forest green. Dark green. For the first two years I met Mrs. Abbott, I thought they were black, but if you look very closely they are a frightening dark green.
This is me free Write for the Bond song inspired one, #15 I believe.
I would appreciate some direction as to where I should take this as
I might continue it and edit it for my magnum opus.
Also I would like suggestions for a title!
Thanks
This is me free Write for the Bond song inspired one, #15 I believe.
I would appreciate some direction as to where I should take this as
I might continue it and edit it for my magnum opus.
Also I would like suggestions for a title!
Thanks
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Paybacks a B****
I don't feel bad,
do you?
I'm not sad,
are you?
I'm kinda glad,
your not.
I'm not mad,
you are.
You're a cad,
I'm not
We were rad,
together.
We were a leaf. Beautiful, full of energy, and life, but the leave is shriveled, and now it has to fall to the ground and die. Its nature.
Only we weren't a leaf, and we didn't have to die.YOU KILLED US and that is why...
Justice is a cruel mistress.
----------------------------------------------------------
OK, i saw a friend of mine this weekend, that i hadn't seen in a long time, we had a huge falling out, and now we barely speak to one another. So i wrote this poem writing from that point of view, what its like to see one of your oldest friend that you aren't friends with anymore.
I wrote this piece as a gloat, and i specifically used the cheesey rhyming scheme, to show the childishness of this situation. Then, the character just gets so frustrated and angry at their friend that they just start to scream all the reasons why they are so distant now. The whole point of this is to show the line justice is a cruel mistress, that you did betrayed me and now you are going to pay.
I'm not proud of this piece. I'm glad that i wrote about this topic, but not proud of the fact that the character is basking in the failure of their friend. Payback might be a b****, but i don't want to like that and i don't want my characters too either.
do you?
I'm not sad,
are you?
I'm kinda glad,
your not.
I'm not mad,
you are.
You're a cad,
I'm not
We were rad,
together.
We were a leaf. Beautiful, full of energy, and life, but the leave is shriveled, and now it has to fall to the ground and die. Its nature.
Only we weren't a leaf, and we didn't have to die.YOU KILLED US and that is why...
Justice is a cruel mistress.
----------------------------------------------------------
OK, i saw a friend of mine this weekend, that i hadn't seen in a long time, we had a huge falling out, and now we barely speak to one another. So i wrote this poem writing from that point of view, what its like to see one of your oldest friend that you aren't friends with anymore.
I wrote this piece as a gloat, and i specifically used the cheesey rhyming scheme, to show the childishness of this situation. Then, the character just gets so frustrated and angry at their friend that they just start to scream all the reasons why they are so distant now. The whole point of this is to show the line justice is a cruel mistress, that you did betrayed me and now you are going to pay.
I'm not proud of this piece. I'm glad that i wrote about this topic, but not proud of the fact that the character is basking in the failure of their friend. Payback might be a b****, but i don't want to like that and i don't want my characters too either.
Are we just going to wait it out?
The year of 2009 gave us many exciting breakthrough debuts (such as Florence and the Machine), as well as some great work from already established artists (such as Tegan and Sara and The Yeah Yeah Yeahs).
Now that we're in the new year of 2010, I figured I would look back towards the released in 2009 and rank my top 5 albums of 2009.
#5. 'Hands' - Little Boots
Little boots debut 'Hands' is a delicious album full of groovy, indie-pop dance songs. While I feel like there are a few weak songs on the album both lyrically and soundwise, the catchy and fun moments make up for them. The instruments and techniques she uses to create her unique sound are also very interesting, and provide her music with a very rich texture. I imagine that this CD would be particularly enjoyed by Bohemian folks living on the moon. (and thats not a bad thing by any means)
#4. 'Lungs' - Florence and the Machine
Florence has truly created a unique and beautiful sound, recording layers upon layers of beautiful harps, acoustic guitar, hand claps and undeterminable thumps and claps. All together this album creates for a beautiful, atmospheric and dreamy sound which is in sharp contrast to Florence's voice. The songwriting is also definitely of note, being full of symbolism and beautiful imagery. The only downside to this album is that over long periods of time I feel like it seems like Florence is just yelling at you. The vocal dynamics could've been gentler in parts, while the power behind her voice IS still effective
#3 'The Promise' - Bif Naked
Bif Naked refuses to let anything stop her, which this album is a solid demonstration of. Bif, having cancer and spending much of her time in the hospital took on this endeavour in between chemotherapy sessions and lots of resting. She proved to all of her fans she could still rock just as hard, even if bald, and gave inspiration to many that they could be strong even when feeling weak. Bif took a darker direction in this album than she has before, drifting from pop-rock into a harder rock and documenting some of her struggles with cancer.
#2 'The Listening' - Lights
After her catchy EP, Lights finally released her full length album in 2009! It did not disappoint with its catchy, galactical, uber pop sound. This dancy, dreamy album had a lot of nice material on it, the only downside being that some of it started to sound the same since she consistenly uses the same style in all of her songs. Still, overall definitely a notable album from 2009.
#1 'Ellipse' - Imogen Heap
My favourite album of the year strayed a bit from Imogens last release 'Speak For Yourself' pop sound, and into a more art-pop sound. The gentle, soothing and creative arrangements are captivating, and while it's not in your face and catchy, it's subtlety is the beautiful thing about it. I believe Imogen has captured the true essence of her talent in this album, and that is why I believe it was the number 1 release of 2009.
Now that we're in the new year of 2010, I figured I would look back towards the released in 2009 and rank my top 5 albums of 2009.
#5. 'Hands' - Little Boots
Little boots debut 'Hands' is a delicious album full of groovy, indie-pop dance songs. While I feel like there are a few weak songs on the album both lyrically and soundwise, the catchy and fun moments make up for them. The instruments and techniques she uses to create her unique sound are also very interesting, and provide her music with a very rich texture. I imagine that this CD would be particularly enjoyed by Bohemian folks living on the moon. (and thats not a bad thing by any means)
#4. 'Lungs' - Florence and the Machine
Florence has truly created a unique and beautiful sound, recording layers upon layers of beautiful harps, acoustic guitar, hand claps and undeterminable thumps and claps. All together this album creates for a beautiful, atmospheric and dreamy sound which is in sharp contrast to Florence's voice. The songwriting is also definitely of note, being full of symbolism and beautiful imagery. The only downside to this album is that over long periods of time I feel like it seems like Florence is just yelling at you. The vocal dynamics could've been gentler in parts, while the power behind her voice IS still effective
#3 'The Promise' - Bif Naked
Bif Naked refuses to let anything stop her, which this album is a solid demonstration of. Bif, having cancer and spending much of her time in the hospital took on this endeavour in between chemotherapy sessions and lots of resting. She proved to all of her fans she could still rock just as hard, even if bald, and gave inspiration to many that they could be strong even when feeling weak. Bif took a darker direction in this album than she has before, drifting from pop-rock into a harder rock and documenting some of her struggles with cancer.
#2 'The Listening' - Lights
After her catchy EP, Lights finally released her full length album in 2009! It did not disappoint with its catchy, galactical, uber pop sound. This dancy, dreamy album had a lot of nice material on it, the only downside being that some of it started to sound the same since she consistenly uses the same style in all of her songs. Still, overall definitely a notable album from 2009.
#1 'Ellipse' - Imogen Heap
My favourite album of the year strayed a bit from Imogens last release 'Speak For Yourself' pop sound, and into a more art-pop sound. The gentle, soothing and creative arrangements are captivating, and while it's not in your face and catchy, it's subtlety is the beautiful thing about it. I believe Imogen has captured the true essence of her talent in this album, and that is why I believe it was the number 1 release of 2009.
Disney encourages (unrealistic) faith in 'the system'
**spoiler about ending of Happy Feet, the movie.
Over the holidays - like many of you, I'm sure - I seemed to have a lot of time on my hands. It was simply glorious to do nothing at all for hours. Nearly every other night my family and I would sit down in front of the TV to enjoy a movie together. One of the movies my sister insisted upon watching was called Happy Feet, an animated film that had been released nearly three years prior to my first viewing of it.
The movie begins quite like March of the Penguins, a captivating and moving documentary about the lives of Antarctica's creatures. The story follows the penguin character known as Mumble, whose parents are shocked and helpless as they come to realize that unlike all penguins in their group, Mumble couldn't sing. Every penguin had a heartsong, but no matter how hard Mumble tried, he was lucky if he could hit even a single note. So, Mumble resorted to the only thing that he felt came naturally to him: dancing.
The waddle elders did not agree with this monstrosity. It was unnatural - they even blamed Mumble and his curious defect for the lack of fish in the waters of Antarctica. After being banished by the elders and determined to prove his worth, Mumble ventures into the unknown to find the 'aliens' who he believes are behind the shortage of food.
While this film is, without a doubt, a loveable addition to Walt Disney's collection of animated tales, something about it bothered me: The ending of the film was, in a word, happy. I don't pretend that this is what I had hoped for, but the satisfaction came with an air of impossibility. Impossibility and shame. While I admit this resentment could be a result of my getting older and more accustomed to/accepting of the harmful and unjust ways of the human race, it was the first time that I had deemed the ending of what should be a childhood movie as immoral and deceiving.
In the end, Mumble learns that it is indeed the 'aliens' (humans) who are responsible for the shortage of fish. He teaches the entire waddle - hundreds of penguins - to learn his otherwise 'unnatural' dance abilities to communicate with the humans, as he recognizes that they seem to respond this this activity. And surprise, surprise - Disney offers a child-friendly conclusion to Mumble's plight.
My problem with this is that creators might as well be telling children that the world would have no problem whatsoever in suffering a blow to the international fish industry in order to save penguins (who, by the way, will probably be killed by Climate-Change-related causes anyway). I sat there, caught between my desire to be happy for Mumble and his family and my anger at the seemingly caring, globally-concious and misleading response of the people.
The fact is, the United Nations (conveniently featured in the initiative regarding the shortage of fish and its affect upon penguins like Mumble) would hardly be so willing, cooperative or efficient to go out of their way for the Antarctic creatures. They refrained from stepping in to save even their own people in Rwanda during the atrocious genocide in 1994; why would they waste resources tacklign the fish industry?
It seems to me that Disney is taking subtle steps to instill a faith in governments and international organizations. And perhaps it will encouage activism at a young age - but calling upon my inner Orwellian, I think it is a clever tactic to plug faith and support for the powers within society and to instill a false sense of humane "political morale".
Cheers.
Over the holidays - like many of you, I'm sure - I seemed to have a lot of time on my hands. It was simply glorious to do nothing at all for hours. Nearly every other night my family and I would sit down in front of the TV to enjoy a movie together. One of the movies my sister insisted upon watching was called Happy Feet, an animated film that had been released nearly three years prior to my first viewing of it.
The movie begins quite like March of the Penguins, a captivating and moving documentary about the lives of Antarctica's creatures. The story follows the penguin character known as Mumble, whose parents are shocked and helpless as they come to realize that unlike all penguins in their group, Mumble couldn't sing. Every penguin had a heartsong, but no matter how hard Mumble tried, he was lucky if he could hit even a single note. So, Mumble resorted to the only thing that he felt came naturally to him: dancing.
The waddle elders did not agree with this monstrosity. It was unnatural - they even blamed Mumble and his curious defect for the lack of fish in the waters of Antarctica. After being banished by the elders and determined to prove his worth, Mumble ventures into the unknown to find the 'aliens' who he believes are behind the shortage of food.
While this film is, without a doubt, a loveable addition to Walt Disney's collection of animated tales, something about it bothered me: The ending of the film was, in a word, happy. I don't pretend that this is what I had hoped for, but the satisfaction came with an air of impossibility. Impossibility and shame. While I admit this resentment could be a result of my getting older and more accustomed to/accepting of the harmful and unjust ways of the human race, it was the first time that I had deemed the ending of what should be a childhood movie as immoral and deceiving.
In the end, Mumble learns that it is indeed the 'aliens' (humans) who are responsible for the shortage of fish. He teaches the entire waddle - hundreds of penguins - to learn his otherwise 'unnatural' dance abilities to communicate with the humans, as he recognizes that they seem to respond this this activity. And surprise, surprise - Disney offers a child-friendly conclusion to Mumble's plight.
My problem with this is that creators might as well be telling children that the world would have no problem whatsoever in suffering a blow to the international fish industry in order to save penguins (who, by the way, will probably be killed by Climate-Change-related causes anyway). I sat there, caught between my desire to be happy for Mumble and his family and my anger at the seemingly caring, globally-concious and misleading response of the people.
The fact is, the United Nations (conveniently featured in the initiative regarding the shortage of fish and its affect upon penguins like Mumble) would hardly be so willing, cooperative or efficient to go out of their way for the Antarctic creatures. They refrained from stepping in to save even their own people in Rwanda during the atrocious genocide in 1994; why would they waste resources tacklign the fish industry?
It seems to me that Disney is taking subtle steps to instill a faith in governments and international organizations. And perhaps it will encouage activism at a young age - but calling upon my inner Orwellian, I think it is a clever tactic to plug faith and support for the powers within society and to instill a false sense of humane "political morale".
Cheers.
New Year rings in more than just numbers
The ball drops and the clock strikes twelve. Champagne sloshes over the rims of clinking glasses as the end of the countdown is met with celebration of the New Year. I am bombarded by an exuberent (and oxygen-depriving) group hug and it seems all too surreal. I might as well be an extra in an episode of Gossip Girl, sifting through blurred memories of theatrics simmering throughout Upper East Side parties. Perhaps I should be giving credit to the nearly-empty glass in my hand, but it is as though I have been caught in a space/time continum, surging into the future. I'm sure Gene Roddenberry would be only too happy to tag along.
Despite the celebration and excitement, the next decade is under quite a bit of pressure, if you ask me. After hoardes of Top 10 best-and-worst lists being shoved down readers' throats (who are only too willing to be caught up in the hype), it's no surprise that most people are hoping for a brighter, faster, more convenient - and not to mention newsworthy - decade to come.
And all this at the stroke of midnight.
To be fair, it isn't without reason; the past decade has seen a multitude of events both monumental and horrifying; From the Al-Qaeda attacks on the World Trade Centre, ongoing politcal and military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the inaugeration of America's first black President and the rise of MAC in the world of technology and music have all made irreversible and unforgettable footprints, particularly in the history of North America's development. While making an arduous journey to survive the tail end of the worst economic downfall since the 30's, the people certainly have a right to hope for better things to come.
However, time is as much a mystical concept as a computer. It can be controlled and manipulated and technically speaking, created and 'uncreated'. By itself, it cannot instigate change; just because the clock has now struck twelve in each of the world's separate time zones, the second hand certainly isn't obligated to switch channels. Time is manmade. Numbers are manmade. And unfortunately for those who haven't caught on, that means relying on some man-made, people-influenced changes in the years to come. That will never change.
So, to quote an eagerly-followed book series of 2009,
"Hobey-Ho, Let's Go!"
Despite the celebration and excitement, the next decade is under quite a bit of pressure, if you ask me. After hoardes of Top 10 best-and-worst lists being shoved down readers' throats (who are only too willing to be caught up in the hype), it's no surprise that most people are hoping for a brighter, faster, more convenient - and not to mention newsworthy - decade to come.
And all this at the stroke of midnight.
To be fair, it isn't without reason; the past decade has seen a multitude of events both monumental and horrifying; From the Al-Qaeda attacks on the World Trade Centre, ongoing politcal and military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the inaugeration of America's first black President and the rise of MAC in the world of technology and music have all made irreversible and unforgettable footprints, particularly in the history of North America's development. While making an arduous journey to survive the tail end of the worst economic downfall since the 30's, the people certainly have a right to hope for better things to come.
However, time is as much a mystical concept as a computer. It can be controlled and manipulated and technically speaking, created and 'uncreated'. By itself, it cannot instigate change; just because the clock has now struck twelve in each of the world's separate time zones, the second hand certainly isn't obligated to switch channels. Time is manmade. Numbers are manmade. And unfortunately for those who haven't caught on, that means relying on some man-made, people-influenced changes in the years to come. That will never change.
So, to quote an eagerly-followed book series of 2009,
"Hobey-Ho, Let's Go!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)